Setting Parole Conditions to Achieve Public Safety

References/Endnotes

Andrews, D.A. et al, (2006). The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52 (1).

Andrews, D.A., (2007). "Principles of Effective Correctional Programs." In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin, eds., Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.

Andrews, D.A., and Bonta, J., (2007). Risk-Need-Responsivity Model for Offender Assessment and Rehabilitation. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada.

Andrews, D.A., and Bonta, J., (1998). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, Second Edition. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.

Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., and Wormith, J., (2006). The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1):7–27.

Andrews, D.A., and Dowden, C., (2007).  The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of Assessment in Human Service and Prevention and Corrections: Crime-Prevention Jurisprudence.  Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 49(4):439–64.

Andrews, D.A., Dowden, C., and Gendreau, P., (1999).  Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Approaches to Reduced Reoffending: A Meta-Analytic Study of Human Service, Risk, Need, Responsivity, and Other Concerns in Justice Contexts.  Unpublished manuscript. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University.

Bonta, J., (2007). Offender Assessment: General Issues and Considerations. In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada.

Bourgon, G. and Armstrong, B., (2005). Transferring the Principles of Effective Treatment Into a 'Real World' Prison Setting.  Criminal Justice and Behavior 32(1):3-25.

Burke, P., (2008). TPC Reentry Handbook. Implementing the NIC Transition from Prison to Community Model. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections,http://static.nicic.gov/Library/022669.pdf, accessed February 15, 2013.

Carter, M., (2011). Evidence-Based Policy, Practice, and Decisionmaking. Implications for Paroling Authorities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections,http://nicic.gov/library/024198, accessed August 29, 2013.

Center for Effective Public Policy, Parole Violations Revisited (Web Site), http://paroleviolationsrevisited.com/home.htm, accessed August 29, 2013.

Cullen, F. T., and Gendreau, P., (2000). Assessing Correctional Rehabilitation: Policy, Practice, and Prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000: Vol. 3—Policies, Processes, and Decisions of the Criminal Justice System (pp. 109–175). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.

Dishion, T., McCord, J., and Poulin, F., (1999).  When Interventions Harm: Peer groups and Problem Behavior. American Psychologist 54: 755-764.

Dowden, C., (1998).  A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Risk, Need and Responsivity Principles and Their Importance Within the Rehabilitation Debate.  Master's thesis, Carleton University.

Fabelo, T., Nagy, G., and Prins, S., (2011). A Ten-Step Guide to Transforming Probation Departments to Reduce Recidivism. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance,http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/content/ten-step-guide-transforming-probation-departments-reduce-recidivism, accessed August 29, 2013. 

Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. Cullen, F., and Andrews, D., (2001). The Effects of Community Sanctions and Incarceration on Recidivism.  In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming: Volume 1. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.

Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., and Little, T., (1996). Predicting Adult Offender Recidivism: What Works! 1996–07. Ottawa, Canada: Solicitor General of Canada.

Gendreau, P., and Goggin, C., (1996). Principles of Effective Correctional ProgrammingForum on Corrections Research 8(3).

Judicial Branch of Indiana, (2009). Indiana Recommended Special Probation Conditions For Adult Sex Offender, accessed August 28, 2013 at http://www.in.gov/judiciary/probation/files/prob-sex-offender-conditions-adult.pdf.

Lipsey, M.W., and Cullen. F. (2007). The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:297–320.

Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E., and Holsinger, A., (2006). "The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs? Crime and Delinquency 52:77-93.

Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, (2012). Conditions of Supervision DRC3019. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Adult Parole Authority.

Solomon, A. L., Jannetta, J., Elderbroom, B., Winterfield, L., Osborne, J., Burke, P., Stroker, R. P., Rhine, E. & Burrell, W. D. 2008. Putting Public Safety First: 13 Strategies for Successful Supervision and Reentry (Policy Brief). Washington, DC: Pew Center on the States' Public Safety Performance Project, http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/Reports/sentencing_and_
corrections/13_strategies.pdf
, accessed August 29, 2013.

Stroker, R., (2010). Core Competencies: A Resource for Parole Board Chairs, Members, and Executive Staff. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections,www.nicic.gov/library/024198, accessed August 29, 2013.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics (2012).  Probation and Parole in the United States, 2011.  Washington, DC. http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus11.pdf, accessed August 29, 2013.


< Sample Documents

Links >