Use of Valid Actuarial Assessments of Risk and Needs


Andrews, D.A. 2007. "Principles of Effective Correctional Programs." In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin, eds., Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.

Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2006). "The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment." Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7-27.

Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. 5th ed. New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender & Co.

Andrews, D.A., and J. Bonta (2007). Risk-Need-Responsivity Model for Offender Assessment and Rehabilitation (2007–06). Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada.

Andrews, D.A., and C. Dowden (2007).  "The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model of Assessment in Human Service and Prevention and Corrections: Crime-Prevention Jurisprudence." Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 49(4):439–64.

Andrews, D.A., C. Dowden, and P. Gendreau (1999).  Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Approaches to Reduced Reoffending: A Meta-Analytic Study of Human Service, Risk, Need, Responsivity, and Other Concerns in Justice Contexts. Unpub­lished manuscript. Ottawa, Canada: Carleton University.

Bogue, B., N. Campbell, M. Carey, E. Clawson, D. Faust, K. Florio, L. Joplin, G. Keiser, B. Wasson, and W. Woodward (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice in community corrections: The principles of effective intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Bonta, J. (2007). "Offender Assessment: General Issues and Considerations." In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin (eds.), Compen­dium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service Canada. 

Burgess, E.W. (1928). "Factors determining success or failure on parole." In A.W. Bruce, E.W. Burgess, J. Landesco, & A.J. Harno (Eds.), The workings of the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois. Springfield: Illinois Board of Parole, pp. 221-234

Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). "Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects." In J. Horney (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Vol. 3—Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 109–175). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Dawes, R. M., D. Faust and P.E. Meehl. (1989) "Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgment" Science 243. pp. 1668-1674

Dowden, C. (1998).  A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Risk, Need and Responsivity Principles and Their Importance Within the Rehabilitation Debate.  Master's thesis, Carleton University.

Durlauf, S.N. and D. S. Nagin. (2011) "Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both Be Reduced?" Criminology and Public Policy. 10(1) pp. 13-54.

Gendreau, P., C. Goggin, and T. Little (1996). Predicting Adult Offender Recidivism: What Works! 1996–07. Ottawa, Canada: Solicitor General of Canada.

Gendreau, P., C. Goggin, F.T. Cullen, and D.Andrews (2001). "The Effects of Community Sanctions and Incarceration on Recidi­vism." In L.L. Motiuk and R.C. Serin (eds.), Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming: Volume 1. Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Service of Canada.

Kinnevy, S. C. and J. M. Kaplan. (2008) Findings from the APAI International Survey of Releasing Authorities. Philadelphia: Center for Research on Youth and Social Policy, University of Pennsylvania. Available at:

Lipsey, M.W., and F.T. Cullen (2007).  "The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:297–320.

Lowenkamp, C. T. & Latessa, E. J. (2005). "Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement." Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 501–528.

Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2004). "Empirical evidence on the importance of training and experience in using the Level of Service Inventory-Revised." Topics in Community Corrections, 49-53.

Lowenkamp, C. T., & E. J. Latessa. (2004). "Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low risk offenders." In Topics in Community Corrections, 2004. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, pp. 3-8.

< Sample Documents

Links >